Science has been the foundation of a lot of the important technological advances around the globe. From new treatments for cancer and energy production to the latest computer chip technology. While innovation is the primary of science business, it’s all about profit and keeping shareholders satisfied. Business and science were traditionally thought of as two distinct worlds. However, they are interconnected, and it is impossible to isolate the impact of scientific research from its business impacts.

While the business world is predominantly concerned with making money, its longer-term effects can have significant environmental, social and economic consequences. Science is also concerned about the consequences of its actions and its decisions, particularly those http://scorbe.de/preserve-confidentiality-the-data-room-info-for-selling-companies regarding the exploitation of resources and sustainability. A well-run business will, for example exploit a resource at the level that science deems sustainable. But greedy businesses have led to a frenzied use of natural resources and ecological catastrophe.

We have coded the desired results and the effects of these strategies. (TL was the first to do the coding, and AG coded 20% of the papers). We found that corporations use five macro-level strategies that work together to reduce the perceived credibility of unfavourable science and maximise favorable science. These strategies are implemented using meso-strategies, which over time tend to bias evidence in favor of the industry. This eventually leads to three distal results: to cast doubt on the potential harms of industry products and practices, to encourage industry-friendly policies and to increase the use, consumption and sales of industry products and services, thus increasing profits for corporations.